Defendant Dung ‘Vova’ sentenced to 5 years in prison
HanoiThe defendant Le Van Dung (Dirt “Vova”, 52 years) was sentenced to 5 years in prison for allegedly “staging and distributing” 12 clips of false and anti-State content.
On the morning of March 23, “Vova” Dirt was declared a crime by the Hanoi People’s Court Propaganda against the State of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, according to Article 389 of the Criminal Code, 1999; 5 years probation after serving prison sentence.
Regarding this case, the defendant Nguyen Van Son, 66 years old, was sentenced to 18 months of imprisonment for this crime. Hiding criminalsaccording to article 389 of the 2015 Criminal Code.
The Hanoi People’s Procuratorate indictment determined that defendant Dung “often caused trouble and protested the State”, in 2010-2012 was administratively fined three times by the Hoan Kiem District Police for this behavior.
Defendant Dung was at trial on the morning of March 23. Photo: VNA
In March 2017-September 2018, defendant Dung made and uploaded 12 videos on the Internet with the content “propaganda against the State, slandering the government, spreading fake news, causing confusion among people and sparking public outrage.” violated the honor and reputation of the leaders of the Party and the State,” the indictment reads.
At the investigative agency, the defendant said that in 2017 he created the social network account “Alfonso vova” to post the above content.
“Vova” droppings were sought by the special investigative agency in May 2021.
Mr. Son allegedly knew that Dung “Vova” was being sought, but on the evening of June 29, 2021, when he was asked to stay at home in Phuong Tu commune, Ung Hoa district, he agreed to cook rice for him without reporting to the authorities. . June 30, 2021, both arrested.
At the trial this morning, the defendant Dung acknowledged the contents of the charge but did not consider it a violation of the law.
The jury considered this a serious case, violating national security. Defendant Dung knew that his actions were illegal but still deliberately committed the crime.
Defendant Child “approved of the crime, making it difficult to investigate.” The defendant was acquitted of part of his sentence because he was sincere, had no criminal record, had served in the army, had a family with meritorious services for the revolution, etc., the sentence stated.
Hi Us
at Blogtuan.info – Source: vnexpress.net – Read the original article here
