Durable is not to save repair costs, but durable is not having trouble losing time, trouble when using.
Recently, the Korean-Japanese car “war” has become increasingly tense, and the factions sometimes use unwise arguments to argue. Some people tend to choose the option, technology says that it is important that the car serves many utilities, but nowadays cars don’t need to be very durable. But I think that is a rather shallow opinion, not deep.
Like any car, it has to be durable. It should be understood that durability does not conflict with whether it has a lot of equipment and technology. Just because a car is not durable means it will be very bad and “nothing is broken”. Durability means good manufacturing technique, durability of the material, not having little or much shattering.
In terms of durability, obviously Japanese cars are more famous than Korean cars. Not because Korean automakers choose technology and choice, because history shows that Japanese manufacturing and metallurgical technology has its own secrets, many years into the future.
But not only Japanese cars, the German and European automotive industries also produce cars that are just as durable. Porsche is famous for being a durable luxury car, even though it has many options, right? Or like Volvo which is also a car company that doesn’t see a problem, even though safety technology is always number one.
So why need a car that lasts? We will enjoy the comfort brought by the car and feel much happier, if the companion does not occasionally violate this and that to be taken to the repair shop. Long lasting for peace of mind, no time wasted, no fuss. Durability has absolutely nothing to do with wanting the car to be easily resold.
Reader Handsome
at Blogtuan.info – Source: vnexpress.net – Read the original article here
