Why is it proposed to quit? inspect district?
On the afternoon of April 18, the National Assembly Standing Committee gave comments on the revised Inspection Law bill. According to Government Inspector General Doan Hong Phong, the draft Law inherits the current regulations on the organization of state inspection agencies and designs the model of inspection agencies to suit state management practices. of ministries, sectors and localities.
The inspection agencies by administrative level include the Government inspectorate, provincial inspectorate, district inspectorate.
Verification of this content, Chairman of the Legal Committee Hoang Thanh Tung said that the Standing Committee of the Law Committee basically agreed on the organization of the Government Inspectorate and the Provincial Inspectorate as at present. However, on the district inspectorate, in the Standing Committee there are two types of opinions.
The first type of opinion proposes not to organize a district-level inspection agency. The reason is, reducing the focal point of specialized agencies under the District People’s Committee with 713 District Inspectors, in line with the Party’s policy on streamlining the organizational apparatus and downsizing the staff; overcome the situation of “spreading out” of the staffing of district-level inspection agencies, supplementing human resources to improve the quality and performance of provincial-level inspectors…
General Inspector Doan Hong Phong.
On the contrary, the second type of opinion favors continuing to maintain the District Inspectorate because there has been a long-term stable formation and development process, which is basically still relevant up to now.
It is necessary to maintain and strengthen the administrative inspection agency at the district level to advise and assist the district People’s Committee on inspection, anti-corruption and anti-corruption work, citizen reception, and settlement of complaints and denunciations. set; ensure strict adherence to the principle “where there is a manager, there is an inspector”.
Besides, keeping the model of the District Inspector is also to ensure the appropriateness and effective implementation of the provisions of the Law on Organization of Local Government, the Law on Complaints, the Law on Denunciations, and the Law on Anti-corruption because of these laws. All assign certain tasks and powers to the District Inspectors…
“The majority of opinions in the Standing Committee of the Law Committee agree with the first type of opinion,” said Mr. Hoang Thanh Tung.
In the position of executive discussion, Vice Chairman of the National Assembly Nguyen Khac Dinh asked the National Assembly Standing Committee to give opinions on whether or not to quit the district inspectorate because many other laws are involved. “
The district inspectorate not only acts as an inspector but also helps the District People’s Committee deal with complaints and denunciations, and prevent corruption.
Remove the district inspector, who will help the district do it? Not to mention, the district is now very large like Thu Duc city, 3 districts combined with a very large population, many jobs. Or if Ha Long city joins Hoanh Bo district, Hoanh Bo district alone, I go as wide as Bac Ninh province”, Mr. Dinh raised the issue.
Indispensable district inspectors
Commenting on this content, Head of the Committee for Deputies Affairs Nguyen Thi Thanh said that when it comes to district inspectors, there is a view that this agency is similar to the People’s Council model, thinking that this level is a formality. However, according to Ms. Thanh, it is because the organization is not good, or the layout of the force is still thin.
Therefore, she agrees with continuing to maintain the current inspection system at all levels, including district inspectors, but it is necessary to strengthen organizational reform and improve efficiency for district inspectors.
“If the cases are solved right from the grassroots, there will be no backlog, prolonged pressing, or pushing and becoming a burden for superiors”, Ms. Thanh emphasized.
Agreeing with the current 3-level inspection model, Standing Vice Chairman of the National Assembly Tran Thanh Man said that it should not be abandoned. Because district-level inspectors represent the state to inspect the implementation of socio-economic development tasks in the locality, settle complaints and denunciations…
“If the district inspection is removed, who will do this? We must study it carefully,” Mr. Man Luu said.
According to National Assembly Chairman Vuong Dinh Hue, the flow of opinion is that only central and provincial inspectors should be involved in the development strategy of the inspection industry until 2020, with a vision to 2030.
“I think this should be discussed by the National Assembly, we should not fix it,” said the National Assembly Chairman. He suggested that the drafting committee and the verifying agency need to explain this issue more deeply, it is important to argue why the inspection is 2 levels, or 3 levels.
After explaining, Government Inspector General Doan Hong Phong stated that the position of this agency is to keep the district inspectorate on the principle that “where there is state management, there is inspection and examination”.
Concluding the working session, National Assembly Vice Chairman Nguyen Khac Dinh said that the National Assembly Standing Committee basically agreed to maintain the 3-level model and proposed to include in the draft law the function of preventing negativity in the banking industry. inspection in addition to the inspection function; Anti-corruption; citizen reception, settlement of complaints and denunciations.
at Blogtuan.info – Source: Soha.vn – Read the original article here