The Ho Chi Minh City Public Security Investigation Police Agency has transferred all case files, evidence, and investigation conclusions to the People’s Procuracy of the same level, proposing to prosecute the accused Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang (27 years old). living in Gia Lai) for Murder and Torture of Others; defendant Nguyen Kim Trung Thai (37 years old, living in District 1) on charges of Tormenting others and Concealing crimes.
Defendants Nguyen Kim Trung Thai and Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang. Photo: FBNV
After the conclusion of the investigation, talking with PV Dan Viet, lawyer Nguyen Anh Thom (Hanoi Bar Association) – the legal support for the baby’s family said, Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang may have to face The maximum sentence is the death penalty.
Lawyer Thom said that Trang’s criminal acts infringed on the right to be protected in terms of body, health, honor and dignity, and infringed on human life and especially the lives of children, who are weak and vulnerable. This is not only protected by the Constitution and laws, but also protected by international conventions on children’s rights to which the Socialist Republic of Vietnam has joined.
The incident that happened on December 22, 2021 is the result of a brutal violent process, madly beating the child directly into the vital areas of the body, leading to death.
Therefore, the subject’s conduct constituted the crime of Murder. Crimes and penalties are specified at Points b, n, Clause 1, Article 123 of the Penal Code.
In addition to beating the baby to death on December 22, 2021, the time before that, the subject also cruelly treated the baby, causing physical and mental pain to the baby, so he had to be criminally responsible for the crime. abusing another person as prescribed at Point b, Clause 2, Article 140 of the Penal Code.
In the same consecutive period, subject Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang has committed 2 crimes, in which murder is a particularly serious crime with many aggravating circumstances (with thug nature, murder under 16 years old). age, for despicable motives…).
From the lawyer’s point of view, the fact that Trang used force to beat and torture her child as their testimony was to teach him to study is a fallacy, concealing his motives and goals for personal revenge and self-interest. own century.
The criminal act of the subject shows a cruel and unhuman nature, so it is necessary to handle it most severely according to the provisions of the law with the highest possible penalty that is the death penalty. , in accordance with the provisions of the law.
For defendant Nguyen Trung Kim Thai, lawyer Thom said that Thai had signs of accomplices to murder.
The lawyer analyzed, at the investigation agency, Thai said from mid-2020, Trang sometimes beat and yelled at her daughter. By October 2021, A. had to study online, Trang tutored and often scolded, beaten with hands and feet, wooden sticks, iron trees, plastic pipes, rattan whips…
Lawyer Nguyen Anh Thom (Hanoi Bar Association). Photo: NVCC
Recovering the previous camera, the authorities recorded that Trang repeatedly abused and beat the baby and was witnessed by Thai but did not intervene. Thai also admitted that he had witnessed many times when his daughter was beaten by her step-aunt, and even once held a stick to hit her.
Thai knew that Trang used whips and sticks to beat her children many times, consecutively and hit her, causing injuries in some dangerous areas, possibly affecting her life, but thought that she did not think about the serious consequences, so she still let Trang “teach her”. coax” in the past.
On December 22, 2021, baby A. was brutally tortured for about 4 hours before her death. Thai declared that he went to work and did not witness Trang beat him. When he got home, he saw the child fainting, gave first aid, but felt that the child no longer had any reflexes, so he took him to the hospital.
From the point of view of lawyer Thom, Thai’s criminal act as an accomplice to Trang’s crime of Torture and accomplice to Murder is grounded.
Thai witnessed Trang often brutally beat her grandchild every day when teaching online, not only did not dissuade her, but also agreed and joined Trang in beating the child.
Thai admitted that many times he witnessed Trang beat his son and Thai himself joined in the fight. Considering the nature of Trang’s act of brutally beating the baby to death for about 4 hours on December 22, 2021, it was due to the great spiritual “help” of the father.
The Thai subject claimed that he went to work, so he did not witness Trang beat his child on December 22, 2021, which may be a fallacy. Thai mobile phones directly connect to the camera in the room where the crime occurred.
There’s no reason why I don’t know for 4 hours. It is the defendant’s right to declare that he does not know.
However, through part of Thai’s testimony along with subjective consciousness and collected documents and evidence, it can be seen that there are signs of accomplices with Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang on the crime of murder with Indirect Intentional Error according to regulations. in Clause 2, Article 10 of the Penal Code.
Thai realized that “Trang used whips and sticks to hit her children many times, consecutively and hit her, causing injuries in some dangerous areas, which could affect her life, but she thought she didn’t think about the consequences”.
Thai’s perception in this case belongs to the indirect intentional error, so wherever the consequences happen, Thai must be responsible for that. When the baby was beaten to death by Trang, Thai must be responsible for accomplices The murder is grounded, in accordance with the provisions of the law and true to the nature of the crime.
Thus, it can be seen that Thai’s behavior is emotionless, cold, and cruel than Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang, who is thinking that the subject directly beat his own child for a long time and leads to death, so it is necessary to Only the strictest handling is commensurate with the nature and extent of the consequences they cause.
at Blogtuan.info – Source: Eva.vn – Read the original article here
