The death of an 8-year-old stepmother: The biological father must be prosecuted for accomplices in the murder of the true nature!

Regarding the case of 8-year-old NTVA girl, in Ho Chi Minh City, being abused leading to death at the end of 2021, the Ho Chi Minh City Public Security Investigation Police Agency transferred all the case files and evidence, investigation conclusion to the People’s Procuracy of the same level, proposing to prosecute defendant Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang (27 years old, living in Gia Lai) on charges of “Murder” and “Abusing others”; defendant Nguyen Kim Trung Thai (37 years old, living in District 1) on charges of “Torturing others” and “Concealing crimes”.

Nguyen Kim Trung Thai (right) and Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang (centre) abused VA (8 years old, Thai’s biological son) many times while living in Saigon Pearl apartment building (ward 22, Binh Thanh district, Ho Chi Minh City). Ho Chi Minh City).

The ‘step mother’ was sentenced to death, but the crime was not over

Talk to PV InfoneRegarding the investigation conclusion of the Ho Chi Minh City Police, lawyer Nguyen Anh Thom – Head of the Office of Legal Affairs Nguyen Anh (Hanoi Bar Association) – the lawyer representing to protect the child’s interests said: “Even if Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang’s behavior is punished with the death penalty, the crime is not over.

Because Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang’s criminal acts have infringed on the right to be protected in terms of body, health, honor and dignity, and infringed on human life and especially the life of children, who are vulnerable. protected by the Constitution and the law, but also recognized and protected by international conventions on children’s rights to which the Socialist Republic of Vietnam has joined.

According to the lawyer, the incident that happened on December 22, 2021 was the result of a brutal violent process, madly beating the grandchild directly into key areas of the body leading to death (due to acute pulmonary edema). , on the body there are many bruises, hematomas, broken ribs, The head area also has a wound,…). Therefore, the subject’s behavior has constituted the crime of “Murder”. Crimes and penalties are specified at Points b, n, Clause 1, Article 123 of the Penal Code.

In addition to beating the baby to death on December 22, 2021, the time before that, the subject also cruelly treated the baby, causing the baby to suffer physical and mental pain, so he had to be criminally responsible for the crime. Torture others” as prescribed at point b, Clause 2, Article 140 of the Penal Code.

In the same period of time, subject Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang has committed 2 crimes, in which the crime of “Murder” is a particularly serious crime, with many aggravating circumstances (with thug nature, murder and murder). under the age of 16, for a despicable motive, intentionally committed the crime to the end by beating and torturing him like in the Middle Ages for 4 hours until he lost consciousness before stopping).

According to the lawyer’s point of view, the fact that the subject of Trang used force to beat and torture her nephew as their testimony was to “teach him to study” is just a fallacy, concealing his motives and goals for personal vengeance. and selfishness.

“The criminal act of the subject shows a cruel and inhuman nature, so it is necessary to handle it most severely according to the provisions of the law with the highest penalty to face. Death is grounded and in accordance with the law,” the lawyer affirmed.

The biological father has signs of accomplices to murder

As for Nguyen Trung Kim Thai, lawyer Thom said:Thai has signs of accomplice to murder”.

The lawyer cited the evidence: “Because at the investigation agency, Thai said that since mid-2020, Trang sometimes beat and yelled at her daughter. By October 2021, baby A had to study online, Trang tutored and taught. and often cursed, beaten with hands and feet, wooden trees, iron trees, plastic pipes, rattan whips…

Recovering the previous camera, the authorities recorded that Trang repeatedly abused and beat the baby and was witnessed by Thai but did not intervene. Thai also admitted that many times he witnessed his daughter being beaten by her “step aunt”, and Thai herself once hit her with a stick. Thai knew that Trang used whips and sticks to beat her children many times, consecutively and hit her, causing injuries in some dangerous areas, possibly affecting her life, but thought that she did not think about the serious consequences, so she still let Trang “teach her”. coax” in the past.

On December 22, 2021, baby A. was brutally tortured for about 4 hours before her death. Thai declared that he went to work and did not witness Trang beat him. When he got home, he saw the child fainting and gave first aid, but he felt that he had no reflexes, so he took him to the hospital.”

From the above evidence, lawyer Thom stated: “Thai’s criminal act as an accomplice to Trang on the crime of “tortured others” and accomplices “Murder” is grounded. Thai witnessed Trang often often brutally beat him every day when teaching online, not only did not dissuade him, but also agreed and joined Trang to beat the child.

Thai admitted that many times he witnessed Trang beat his son and Thai himself joined in the fight. By nature, Trang’s act of brutally beating the baby to death for about 4 hours on December 22, 2021 was due to the great spiritual “help” of the father. The Thai subject declared that he went to work, so he did not witness Trang beat his child on December 22, 2021, which is just a fallacy. Because Thai mobile phones directly connect to the camera of the room where the crime happened. There’s no reason why I don’t know for 4 hours.

It is the defendant’s right to declare that he does not know. However, through part of Thai’s testimony along with his subjective sense and collected documents and evidence, it can be seen that there are signs of accomplice with Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang on the crime of “murder” with the error of “intentionally indirect ” according to the provisions of Clause 2, Article 10 of the Penal Code.

Thai realized that “Trang used whips and sticks to hit her children many times, consecutively and hit her, causing injuries in some dangerous areas, which could affect her life, but she thought she didn’t think about the consequences”. Thai’s perception in this case belongs to the indirect intentional error, so wherever the consequences happen, Thai must be responsible for that.

When the baby was beaten to death by Trang, Thai must be responsible for accomplices The murder is grounded, in accordance with the provisions of the law and true to the nature of the crime.

Thus, it can be seen that Thai’s behavior is emotionless, cold, and cruel than Nguyen Vo Quynh Trang, who is thinking that the subject directly beat his own child for a long time and leads to death, so it is necessary to Only the strictest handling is commensurate with the nature and extent of the consequences they cause.”

“I pray that my soul will be freed and everyone will always be by my side to claim justice and justice for me”, lawyer Thom expressed his wish.

Yen River