Return the file of the ‘super cheat’ case appropriating hundreds of billions of dong from 3 banks

Previously, bringing Thanh and 24 accomplices to trial in January, the jury also asked to return the file to clarify some more details.

According to the allegation, from June 18 to August 21, 2018, defendant Nguyen Thi Ha Thanh borrowed VND 50 billion from Mr. Dang Nghia T. The defendant asked Mr. T. to deposit his savings into many books in his and his wife’s names, and then give the savings books to Ms. Thanh to keep.

After that, Ms. Thanh and Nguyen Thanh Tung (Director of Jeongho Landmark Company) used the legal status of Jeongho Landmark Company, falsified goods purchase and sale contracts, debt reconciliation records with other companies and Taking advantage of the trust and irresponsibility of NCB’s staff in credit granting and disbursement, both journalists signed Mr. and Mrs. T’s signatures on documents, appropriating NCB’s 47.5 billion copper.

Similarly, Ms. Thanh borrowed VND 52 billion from Mr. T. by asking Mr. T to deposit savings in his and her husband’s name to PVcombank, and then gave the passbook to the defendant to keep.

Ms. Thanh and Nguyen Thanh Tung used the legal status of Jeongho Landmark Company, made false sales and purchase contracts, and debt reconciliation records with Hoang Nguyen Company.

Both took advantage of the trust and irresponsibility of PVcombank’s staff in document collection, credit appraisal and disbursement to fake signatures and fingerprints of Mr. deposit pledge contract documents in the credit application file to be disbursed and appropriated from PVcombank 49.4 billion dong.

According to Mr. T.’s testimony, he has just received 4 billion dong of interest from Ms. Thanh and has not yet received the principal. Meanwhile, defendant Thanh claimed to have paid Mr. Toan 35 billion dong, but there was no proof of that.

Mr. T. said he did not know that Mrs. Thanh would take his passbook as a mortgage, withdraw money, nor receive any notice from the bank…

Before the inconsistent testimony of the defendant and the person involved, this time, the jury continued to return the file, asking to clarify whether the victim in the case was Mr. Dang Nghia T. had a fraud accomplice with defendant Nguyen Thi Ha Thanh or not, and what is the actual debt relationship of Ms. Thanh and Mr. T.?

The jury also said that it was not clear how much of the total interest Mr. T had received from the defendant Thanh and the amount of interest she had received from the banks, and if the amount Ms. Thanh still owed Mr. T. was correct. is 122 billion dong?

Besides, the jury also asked to clarify the behavior of defendant Quan Trong Duc (former director of Viet A Commercial Joint Stock Bank, Hanoi branch) to see if he was an accomplice in fraud with Nguyen Thi Ha Thanh or not?

In addition to the case related to Mr. T., the investigation results showed that, at Viet A Commercial Joint Stock Bank, during the period from June 5 to November 26, 2018, Ms. Thanh borrowed money from many individuals. and then colluded with bank officials, appropriating this bank’s amount of more than 273 billion dong.

According to the indictment, Ms. Thanh and Nguyen Thi Thu Huong (customer relations specialist at Corporate Banking Department, Viet A Joint Stock Bank) tricked two other people into signing loan documents and withdrawal documents to appropriate their property. Mr. Trieu Hung C. 29 billion VND; appropriating Vu Duc T. 19.5 billion VND and appropriating Vu Thanh L. 9.5 billion VND.

T.Velvet