Life Style

Disagreement from a design point of view, “killing” the opponent with harsh disparagement

Each of the leading fashion houses on the planet represents a brilliant mind, a tall ego or a dictator with great taste. The confidence of the “leading bird” of each brand brings them success, but it also brings a lot of trouble to the opponent, specifically here is the nature of speech.

Before we get to Gianni Versace’s humorous twists on Miucci Prada, or Stefano Gabbana’s uncharacteristic sarcasm, the fashion industry has seen a Gabrielle Bonheur Chanel forcefully destroy confidence, as well as talent. by Christian Dior just because of disagreements around how to honor the female body.

tai xuong 165286759942786980804 1653401517138 1653401517245612040183
christian dior profile1 1652867599388141797864 1653401521394 16534015214791111766514

Referring to this enmity, it is necessary to mention the year 1947 – the time when the annals of the fashion industry appeared the name Christian Dior as a fresh and cool breeze, reviving the fashion village after World War 2 by creativity. Great The New Look. Not only shocking with its graceful and unprecedented design, Dior redefines femininity with a bust-up, puffy, cascading corset and intricate textures. He himself also stated: ”I don’t like pragmatism, what I like is an elegant fashion dream”.

And the paradox is, right here, the “dresser” Chanel also honors the elegant beauty but in the most pragmatic way. Born under the constellation of Lion with pride as high as ten thousand Eiffel Towers stacked on top of each other, Coco Chanel couldn’t help but “itchy eyes” at her junior’s straightforward and true statement.

Also have to talk a little bit about the fashion thinking of these two “banyan trees”. While Christian Dior creates a tight Bar Jacket or corset that hugs the body or at least shows all the female beauty (according to the beauty standards that society perceives); Chanel took feminism as the original, liberating the female body with loose-fitting clothes, covering all advantages and disadvantages. What this powerful woman wants is to use fashion to speak of equal rights – something that is overlooked in society at all times.

3ebf0e369272f569b261bb48f558008b 16528802128162078050706 1653401528089 1653401528237552019263
1wwhndvrsziglw8zkve6zcg 1652880127754348512289 1653401531867 16534015319651793177582

If Chanel’s designs (left photo) create conditions for the wearer’s body to “swim” in it, Dior’s clothes stay tight.

Ridiculous at the perspective of the juniors’ appearance, the honorable lady sighed: “Look how ridiculous these women are, wearing clothes by a man who doesn’t know women, never had one, and dreams of being one” (Translation: Look how ridiculous those aunties are! Dressed from a man who doesn’t understand women, has never dated a woman, and dreams of becoming a woman).

Christian Dior was originally a gay man, so the witty joke above was no different from an attack on his sexual orientation. And yet, she continued to add a few more shots: “Wow! Dior doesn’t make women’s clothes, he just ‘lifts’ it up!” (ironically, Dior’s breast augmentation corset design), or “The girls in Dior look like an old armchair!”

If someone asked, Chanel said, but if someone poked the “itchy spot”, Chanel would have to smear her mouth. She frankly expressed her point of view: Christian Dior has done a good job of bringing women back to a time a century ago, when all styles of clothing were created to suppress the female figure. That means, even the iconic lovely Bar jacket is just a torture machine in Coco Chanel’s eyes.

9e88cd68aa1af4159d73f47c5c4c931c 1652881375328265929033 1653401535840 1653401536123510075205
bc00f2b472a6b23f97b059b932dcd573 1652881375536874215838 1653401541594 1653401541723666258010

With different silhouette characteristics (the overall look of an outfit when worn on the body), the two fashion houses have created different, fierce but interesting battle lines.

At the time Karl Lagerfeld was responsible for creating art at the Chanel house, he was fiercely criticized for tightening and shortening, splitting suits, or putting on the catwalk a series of revealing bikinis.

The majestic “martial arts” with the victory in favor of Gabrielle Bonheur Chanel has become an anecdote in the fashion village, good enough to be handed down forever. These two brands that represent the creative quintessence of the French garment industry are not only “annoying each other” but also compete for customers. Dior is pampered in Europe but suffers an underdog when it comes to America, and Chanel is the complete opposite.

Is this confrontation arranged by fate to make the already harsh fashion world even more noisy?

Photo: Synthesis

https://kenh14.vn/moi-thu-truyen-kiep-cua-chanel-va-dior-bat-dong-tu-quan-diem-thiet-ke-sat-phat-doi-phuong-bang-loi- miet-thi-gat-gao-20220518171719636.chn

https://kenh14.vn/moi-thu-truyen-kiep-cua-chanel-va-dior-bat-dong-tu-quan-diem-thiet-ke-sat-phat-doi-phuong-bang-loi- miet-thi-gat-gao-20220518171719636.chn

You are reading the article Disagreement from a design point of view, “killing” the opponent with harsh disparagement
at Blogtuan.info – Source: Afamily.vn – Read the original article here

Back to top button